PDA

View Full Version : Some good reasons Brits, Aussies and South Africans should want a Korean War sim



SkyChimp
08-06-2005, 05:08 PM
http://members.cox.net/us.fighters/mustangs.jpg
http://members.cox.net/us.fighters/spits.jpg
http://members.cox.net/us.fighters/seafury.jpg
http://members.cox.net/us.fighters/firefly.jpg
http://members.cox.net/us.fighters/sunderland.jpg
http://members.cox.net/us.fighters/meteor1.jpg
http://members.cox.net/us.fighters/meteor2.jpg
http://members.cox.net/us.fighters/carrier.jpg

MEGILE
08-06-2005, 05:11 PM
Sea Fury is so bad-assed it has to wear diapers.

+1 for Korea.

p1ngu666
08-06-2005, 05:13 PM
could expand into malaysia. hornets, lincons and other types http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

SeaNorris
08-06-2005, 05:14 PM
Those rockets are overmodeled http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif

LStarosta
08-06-2005, 05:20 PM
said the guy with the Spitfire in his sig.

MEGILE
08-06-2005, 05:22 PM
Said the guy with Pre in his sig.

LStarosta
08-06-2005, 05:58 PM
Feel free to file a complaint about an overmodelled Pre in God's Ready Room (GRR). Apparently Ian Stewart, Mohammed Gammoudi, Lasse Viren, Kip Kayno, Puttemans, and yes, even George Young posted there enough after Munich, forcing God to take back Pre in 1975.


A friend of mine was a moderator. True story.

Atomic_Marten
08-06-2005, 06:13 PM
http://free-vk.t-com.hr/domagoj/smileys/lol_2.gif

VW-IceFire
08-06-2005, 06:19 PM
Flying Sea Furies and Fireflies would be AMAZING!

Forget the Sabre VS Mig-15 battles...Furies and La-9s all the way!

jensenpark
08-06-2005, 07:48 PM
Originally posted by Megile:
Sea Fury is so bad-assed it has to wear diapers.

+1 for Korea.

Truer words have never been said on the forum before!!!

Jagdklinger
08-06-2005, 08:29 PM
+1 here too

Can someone tell me what the loadout on the (pictured) Firefly is?

I'd love a Korean War version - primitive radar, uber-props, primitive jets. Cannons instead of fancy missiles.

P-51 Twin Mustangs, DH Hornets, SeaFuries, F9Fs.... http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif

ClnlSandersLite
08-07-2005, 12:17 AM
The only reason I need is that there have been precious few korean era flight sims. None of which have been comprehensive. There's also nothing modern. I don't mind the occaisional mig-15 vs sabre duel, but it was not the focus of korea.

I want a good comprehensive and modern WWI sim more tho. You know, to hold me over for the next decade or 2.

Utchoud
08-07-2005, 12:51 AM
+1 for Korea (no Aussie, Brit nor South African)


Originally posted by Jagdklinger:
Can someone tell me what the loadout on the (pictured) Firefly is?

Looks like 250lb depth charges under the wing. I don't know what's the thing under the fuselage.

Badsight.
08-07-2005, 01:04 AM
i was dissapointed big time at the announcement of BoB

i was so hoping we would see IL-10:Korea instead

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v18/Badsight/IL10_Korea.jpg

from what ive read , the sea-Fury would mostly get owned by all its contempory piston/prop fighters , worst climb/turn/level speed

woofiedog
08-07-2005, 01:27 AM
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif Sounds like a Grrreat Idea to me. Mint Photo's

HotelBushranger
08-07-2005, 03:31 AM
OMG That would be so awesome! Now that I think of it, Korea is becoming more and more appealing. But I suppose one of the things against it is that is a low profile sorta thing, not many people know about it as much as say Vietnam. But yes, Meteors and Mustangs for the RAAF sounds very appealing http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif I saw a pic today of a Mustang with 10 HVAR's and I think about 4-8 bombs underwing. Wouldn't wanna get in the way of that beauty http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

triggerhappyfin
08-07-2005, 08:30 AM
One thing boys and gals...... What would Koreans call it?