PDA

View Full Version : Mr. Oleg - Bombers for Addon?



Recon_609IAP
01-28-2004, 04:29 PM
Oleg.

I have really enjoyed the He111 as a part of FB. I look forward to the opportunity to fly the B25, Ju88 and 110.

I have not heard any definitives.

Are they to make the addon?
If not - would they be released if finished soon after? And if so, would it be possible to predict a 'finish' date?

Thanks - and I continue to love this game!

S!
609IAP_Recon

http://www.leeboats.com/609/sig/609_recon3.jpg
Agnus Dei, Qui Tollis peccata mundi, Miserere nobis. Dona nobis pacem

Recon_609IAP
01-28-2004, 04:29 PM
Oleg.

I have really enjoyed the He111 as a part of FB. I look forward to the opportunity to fly the B25, Ju88 and 110.

I have not heard any definitives.

Are they to make the addon?
If not - would they be released if finished soon after? And if so, would it be possible to predict a 'finish' date?

Thanks - and I continue to love this game!

S!
609IAP_Recon

http://www.leeboats.com/609/sig/609_recon3.jpg
Agnus Dei, Qui Tollis peccata mundi, Miserere nobis. Dona nobis pacem

Recon_609IAP
01-28-2004, 10:25 PM
bump in case you read this tonight http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

S!
609IAP_Recon

http://www.leeboats.com/609/sig/609_recon3.jpg
Agnus Dei, Qui Tollis peccata mundi, Miserere nobis. Dona nobis pacem

Junnun
01-29-2004, 06:48 AM
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-happy.gifMore bombers pleace!!
i`ll Wish IL4 and PE8 will be flyable too..

Bogun
01-29-2004, 09:32 AM
B-25 in initial "Aces Expansion pack" going to be AI-only. Cockpit is not ready yet, will be in one of the following patches.

Bf-110 is going to be there from the beginning

Regards,

AKA_Bogun
http://www.akawardogs.com/

http://img5.photobucket.com/albums/v22/Bogun/Sevastopol.jpg

"The best fighters I met in combat were the American P-51 Mustang and Russian Yak-9U. Both of those types obviously exceeded all Bf109 variants in performance, including the 'K'. The Mustang was unmatched in altitude performance, while the Yak-9U was champion in rate of climb and maneuverability."

- Walter Wolfrum

Willey
01-29-2004, 02:16 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Bogun:
Bf-110 is going to be there from the beginning<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

sure?? Officially, it's still not certain that the 110G-2 will be flyable http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_eek.gif

Recon_609IAP
01-29-2004, 02:18 PM
Thanks.

Any word as to when these will be complete?

We have an official list yet, or is this just rumor?

S!
609IAP_Recon

http://www.leeboats.com/609/sig/609_recon3.jpg
Agnus Dei, Qui Tollis peccata mundi, Miserere nobis. Dona nobis pacem

KG26_Oranje
01-29-2004, 03:45 PM
Are we getting flyable bombers or not?
Please mr Oleg do ure best for us.
And speak to the bilders (3e party etc)to give us flyable bombers.
Dont lets us Bomber pilots down.
Thnx
S! I/KG_Oranje

Future-
01-29-2004, 04:57 PM
"B-25 in initial "Aces Expansion pack" going to be AI-only. Cockpit is not ready yet, will be in one of the following patches.

Bf-110 is going to be there from the beginning"

And may we ask why you are so sure about this? There hasn't been any official word in weeks, and you don't look like an official.
So I'd like to know where you got this info from.

- Future

Commanding Officer of the 530th Bomb Squad
380th Bomb Group 5th AF USAAF

http://invisionfree.com:54/40/30/upload/p1083.jpg

Visit us at http://members.tripod.com/tophatssquadron , home of the 310th FS and the 380th BG

crazyivan1970
01-29-2004, 05:45 PM
Russian connections http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif



V!
Regards,

VFC*Crazyivan aka VFC*HOST

http://www.rmutt.netfirms.com/ivan-reaper.gif

Kozhedub: In combat potential, the Yak-3, La-7 and La-9 fighters were indisputably superior to the Bf-109s and Fw-190s. But, as they say, no matter how good the violin may be, much depends on the violinist. I always felt respect for an enemy pilot whose plane I failed to down.

A.K.Davis
01-29-2004, 05:47 PM
Bomber mafia?

--AKD

http://www.flyingpug.com/pugline2.jpg

mllaneza
01-29-2004, 09:53 PM
Bomber beggers. We want 'em bad. It'll help the online game immensely, especially coops and wars. As started over in general, the TB-3 is a joke plane, and honestly, by 1941 it was. I've had great fun every time I've been a gunner in a TB-3 online, but for any flying past 1942 - and any *serious* flying - we need more bombers. The Ju-88 is sorely missed on the Axis side, but the Allies need a modern multi-engine bomber and preferrably a 4- and 2-engined bomber. B-17 and B-25 would be my pick as covering the most options. B-17 missions will be *very* popular online, and I'm dying to take a B-25 on a low-level attack mission, we'll need a Japanese destroyer and a Maru.

Veteran - Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force. 1993-1951.

Future-
01-29-2004, 09:58 PM
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif

- Future

Commanding Officer of the 530th Bomb Squad
380th Bomb Group 5th AF USAAF

http://invisionfree.com:54/40/30/upload/p1083.jpg

Visit us at http://members.tripod.com/tophatssquadron , home of the 310th FS and the 380th BG

bombing_man
01-29-2004, 10:07 PM
Their right we need b17s, me323s, b24,25,26. their more fun to fly.

bombing_man
01-29-2004, 10:09 PM
Yes we could use some new bombers. B17,25,and 29 are my most favorite. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

owlwatcher
01-30-2004, 03:30 AM
Bombers are great fun . Want bombers

VOL_Mountain
01-30-2004, 03:06 PM
Bombers ? YES !, By all means !

But please, don't continue to stray from the Ost Front. The VVS needs a couple twin engine bombers but realize that this sim is one between the Russians and Germans so unless its Lend-Lease hardware it "Doesn't Fit" (IMHO).

Future-
01-30-2004, 03:09 PM
So our common prayer tonight goes out to the B-25 Mitchell... hopefully, she'll be with us soon, as fully flyable!

- Future

Commanding Officer of the 530th Bomb Squad
380th Bomb Group 5th AF USAAF

http://invisionfree.com:54/40/30/upload/p1083.jpg

Visit us at http://members.tripod.com/tophatssquadron , home of the 310th FS and the 380th BG

Bogun
01-30-2004, 03:23 PM
Sorry gentlemen, I should have included the source - there was a discussion on Sukhoi forum http://sukhoi.ru/forum/showthread.php?s=46367bf7ed25e2680aad01c1cb3cf3bd&threadid=20191&perpage=25&pagenumber=3
were developer mentioned state of B-25 (among other things).

He said - B-25 for now AI, cockpit - closer to the summer.

Regards,

AKA_Bogun
http://www.akawardogs.com/

http://img5.photobucket.com/albums/v22/Bogun/Sevastopol.jpg

"The best fighters I met in combat were the American P-51 Mustang and Russian Yak-9U. Both of those types obviously exceeded all Bf109 variants in performance, including the 'K'. The Mustang was unmatched in altitude performance, while the Yak-9U was champion in rate of climb and maneuverability."

- Walter Wolfrum

Future-
01-30-2004, 04:34 PM
Uhm, thank you for the link... now where's my russian dictionary?

About the B-25 pits not making it to the exp pack..... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGG GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!, to say the least. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_mad.gif

- Future

Commanding Officer of the 530th Bomb Squad
380th Bomb Group 5th AF USAAF

http://invisionfree.com:54/40/30/upload/p1083.jpg

Visit us at http://members.tripod.com/tophatssquadron , home of the 310th FS and the 380th BG

VF-17_WOODMAN
01-30-2004, 04:48 PM
no flyable B-25 yet http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif bugger!!!!!!!

http://www.skyknights.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/CAFlast.jpg
http://www.angelfire.com/retro/confeds/CAF

tagert
01-30-2004, 04:55 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Future-:
Uhm, thank you for the link... now where's my russian dictionary?

About the B-25 pits not making it to the exp pack..... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGG GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!, to say the least. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_mad.gif

- Future

Commanding Officer of the 530th Bomb Squad
380th Bomb Group 5th AF USAAF

http://invisionfree.com:54/40/30/upload/p1083.jpg

Visit us at http://members.tripod.com/tophatssquadron , home of the 310th FS and the 380th BG
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>So... is it official? Dang.. I was looking forward to the 25

TAGERT

Future-
01-30-2004, 07:27 PM
"So... is it official?"

Hell, that's the problem, only a few things are really official at the moment, and unless we hear from 1C/Ubi themselves, many things are still subject to change.
Remember, the last time the officials kept hiding behind their desks, they suddenly jumped us with a dev update, an official statement AND a small patch (1.22).
So hearing nothing from them might be a good sign.

"Dang.. I was looking forward to the 25"

Well, things don't look good right now... but then again, at least the external model will be there. I think once the B-25, ai or fully flyable, gets to us, we will see a decrease in B-17 activity.

S!

- Future

Commanding Officer of the 530th Bomb Squad
380th Bomb Group 5th AF USAAF

http://invisionfree.com:54/40/30/upload/p1083.jpg

Visit us at http://members.tripod.com/tophatssquadron , home of the 310th FS and the 380th BG

Jettexas
01-30-2004, 09:47 PM
Keep banging the bomber drum.
I have not yet begun to whine,
A decent Flybale Allied bomber is the ONE thing this finely crafted and incredibly immersive sim is really missing.It is time for an official word, pro or con.
And perhaps a realistic timeline of when we could expect a bomber?
Thanks, S!

Thud-Vols
01-31-2004, 05:42 AM
The only interest I have in the paid add-on would be flyable allied bombers, especially the B-25. This is a bit disappointing. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif

http://ivedog.com/warbirds/assets/images/banners/fadingplanes.gif
http://www.the-volunteers.com/

Aaron_GT
01-31-2004, 09:08 AM
The TB-3 is fun, but faster bombers would
be good.

The Pe-2 flyable in a future expansion
would be nice. The B25 is a good choice too
as it saw services with the USAAF, RAF, and
VVS (and probably other Allied air forces too).

owlwatcher
02-12-2004, 11:10 AM
Would pay for ADD ON Bomber version.

Gato-Loco
02-12-2004, 01:52 PM
I would pay for it too, but it must have bombers that saw action in the eastern front.

hotspace
02-12-2004, 07:22 PM
I would pay for a Lancaster with those 12,000lb and 22,000lb Tallboy and Grand Slam Bombs http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_cool.gif

Hot Space

http://img11.photobucket.com/albums/v33/Hot_Space/me1.jpg