PDA

View Full Version : What plane do you NOT want to see included ?



Capt._Tenneal
05-25-2004, 10:19 AM
This is just for future patches or add-ons.

Too late on the 109Z, Ki-84c, YP-80, etc. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif


My choice : any Spit over Mark 20 -- getting too close to Korean War period.

Capt._Tenneal
05-25-2004, 10:19 AM
This is just for future patches or add-ons.

Too late on the 109Z, Ki-84c, YP-80, etc. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif


My choice : any Spit over Mark 20 -- getting too close to Korean War period.

Franzen
05-25-2004, 10:29 AM
Another LAGG version. Don't have enough spare time to tell the differences between the ones we got. Spits,....I think we got enough. P-51's, got enough of those too. La's, Il-2's, 109's, 190's, Mig's, jets,........hmmm, I think you get my point. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

Ooooo! We need more Yaks http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/blink.gif
He he he, just kidding. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

Fritz Franzen

Chuck_Older
05-25-2004, 10:37 AM
No more "ultimate" versions of anything. We gots enough of them.

Ever notice how there's really no serious flame wars about how the Bf-109E4 is overmodelled? http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

*****************************
The hillsides ring with, "Free the People",
Or can I hear the echoes from the days of '39?
~ Clash

NegativeGee
05-25-2004, 10:41 AM
Just wait for BoB for that to happen..... http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif

"As weaponry, both were good, but in far different ways from each other. In a nutshell, I describe it this way: if the FW 190 was a sabre, the 109 was a florett, or foil, like that used in the precision art of fencing." - Günther Rall

http://www.invoman.com/images/tali_with_hands.jpg

Look Noobie, we already told you, we don't have the Patch!

Franzen
05-25-2004, 10:42 AM
Is the Bf109 E4 overmodelled? If so, in what area?

Fritz Franzen

GT182
05-25-2004, 10:42 AM
The only a/c I'd like to see flyable are... B17s, Ju88s, PBN and Y. Maybe a Lancaster and B24 too. if someone does them. I agree we've got enough of the others.

"GT182" / "vonSpinmeister"
www.bombs-away.net (http://www.bombs-away.net)
"Fly to Survive, Survive to Fly"

tigerroach
05-25-2004, 10:56 AM
I'm thinkin' the Bf109E4 comment was an attempt at ironic humor - an "ultimate" it aint! http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Franzen
05-25-2004, 11:04 AM
He he he, thanks Tigerroach, it's been a long day.

Fritz Franzen

WOLFMondo
05-25-2004, 11:14 AM
Anything that made its first flight after 15th August 1945 IMHO.

If it flew in WW2 then why not put it in IL2:FB if theres a good model and time to program it?

http://bill.nickdafish.com/sig/mondo.jpg
Wolfgaming.net. Where the Gameplay is teamplay (http://www.wolfgaming.net)

Curly_109
05-25-2004, 11:22 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WOLFMondo:
Anything that made its first flight after 15th August 1945 IMHO.

If it flew in WW2 then why not put it in IL2:FB if theres a good model and time to program it?

http://bill.nickdafish.com/sig/mondo.jpg
http://www.wolfgaming.net<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Tottaly agreed... ww2 sim should be ww2 sim. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

McTriggerhappy
05-25-2004, 11:47 AM
p-38, because it sucks

ucanfly
05-25-2004, 11:50 AM
Anything that didn't fly IRL.

LuckyBoy1
05-25-2004, 11:52 AM
Anything not produced in numbers over 100 that actually made it into the field, not just rolled off the assembly line. Also, this majic 100 planes deployed to the field had to have made it by the end of the war in Europe.

Solutions for internet security & spyware problems... http://www.geocities.com/callingelvis911/s_s.html

Luckyboy = Senior hydraulic landing gear designer for the P-11 & Contributing Editor to Complete Users magazine.

Maj_Death
05-25-2004, 11:54 AM
Anything that didn't participate in combat during WW2. The F8F Bearcat is at the top of my list of planes that should not be added. It probebly will be anyways though http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maj_Death here, Stab.I/JG1Death at HL

I build COOPs and DF maps. If you would like some of them you can get them atmy COOP page (http://www14.brinkster.com/triggerhappy770/default.htm)

I/JG1 Oesau is recruiting axis pilots who prefer to fly maximum realism. We accept both veterans and rookies. We fly in VEF2, VOW and may join other online wars in the future. Go to our forums at http://www.jg1-oesau.org/ for more details and to apply.
http://www.bestanimations.com/Humans/Skulls/Skull-06.gif

ForkTailedDevil
05-25-2004, 12:37 PM
I agree with a lot on here. Personally I don't get a lot of enjoynment from flying bombers. I like the fact that they are in the game becuase they add a lof of depth.

I would love to see more tactical bombers like the A-20 Havoc, B-26 Marauder, A-26 Invader, Do-17, Do-217, some Italian tri-motor bombers would be nice also. They don't need to be flyable. If we do get a new flyable VVS plane I would like to see the Pe-3.

I also could do with out planes like the Go-229, YP-80 and the BF-109Z. I have liked flying them. I would like to keep the '46 fanstasy planes kept to a minnimum. I still want my DO-335 "Arrow". In fact if we get a new jet it should be the Meteor since it was operational.

In the future I am looking forward to seeing the RAF Typhoon, Tempest and Mosquito. Also would like to see the MC.200, MC.202 and MC.205 and the G.55 and Re.2005.

"You can teach monkey's to fly better than that"

Yellonet
05-25-2004, 12:39 PM
Any jet or prototype.


- Yellonet

SUPERAEREO
05-25-2004, 01:28 PM
No more Luft'46 planes please.

Bf.109 Z and Go.229 are enough.

I can just about stomach the YP-80 because at least it did fly for real, more than once and technically speaking was present in the MTO before the end of the war (same applies to the BI rocket fighter and would apply to the Gloster Meteor Mk.I but not to the Vampire, the Bearcat or the Sabre).

S!


"The first time I ever saw a jet, I shot it down."
Chuck Yaeger

XyZspineZyX
05-25-2004, 01:46 PM
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

No more 1946 planes any NATION....

Sensei

SUPERAEREO
05-25-2004, 01:48 PM
Sorry Haddock, I should have said Luft/USAAF/RAF/ANY'46 planes LOL!!! http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/88.gif

(Biplanes, give me biplanes!!!)

S!


"The first time I ever saw a jet, I shot it down."
Chuck Yaeger

JorBR
05-25-2004, 02:16 PM
I welcome every plane made flyable, I´m don´t-like-it-don´t-fly-it minded

"Never wrestle with a pig; you both get dirty but the pig enjoys it!"

jenikovtaw
05-25-2004, 03:03 PM
No more "what if" planes.

An overdue TU2 and / or PE2...that i want

http://www.theartofwarfare.net/ftp/graphics/sigs/EXT-jenikovtaw.jpg

D-XXI
05-25-2004, 03:11 PM
Any plane from which the prototype didn't make enough flights to get enough reliable data on their performance before the end of the war in Europe.

The same criteria for Pacific Fighters for ending the war in that theater.

Snow_Wolf_
05-25-2004, 03:19 PM
we so lucky they did not model this P-51 lol

http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/p51-21.jpg

or this one

http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/p51-22.jpg

For the game I really want to see more ground attack planes like Hs-129, A-20 or A-26 invaders, B-25's or anyplanes like those

http://www.cc.jyu.fi/~jtsiekki/mono2.gif
"Master the art of Speed without ever getting a Ticket"

HeinzBar
05-25-2004, 03:31 PM
S!,
No more fantasy planes that were made in numbers of less than 100. And please, no more Pacific planes mixed in the EOT, ie zero, wildcats, etc. What possessed them to add those aircraft to the EOT is beyond me.

HB

http://www.jagdverband44.com/JV44Banner400x75.jpg

Capt._Tenneal
05-25-2004, 05:53 PM
LOL, Snow Wolf. That second Mustang pic... did they get those rocket tubes from surplus V-1 equipment they captured ? http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/88.gif

JJaguar
05-25-2004, 05:58 PM
I would say no planes that were not deployed in the European theatre at least at squadron strength and/or did not engage the enemy in combat service before May 8, 1945.

GEO-oNe
05-25-2004, 06:09 PM
another jet, too many of them

heywooood
05-25-2004, 06:17 PM
having the opportunity to fly anything in a combat flight sim is welcome to me.

If you want to exclude something from your world, thats fine, dont select it and don't fly it... but to tell someone else what to do?

whatever. If they model it - I will happily fly it. You can select something else from the most generous list and fly that.

I hope we will have Skyraiders and F86's and Mig15's and Cougars and Banjo's too !

Franzen
05-25-2004, 07:56 PM
I don't mind getting the "fantasy" or "what if" planes. After all, they are free aren't they. The only thing that concerns me is the limited number of modellers and the time. If a modeller is creating a "what if" plane then he doesn't have time to create the missing planes that WERE really there and played some sort of role. If we weren't missing any of these planes then I would be hoping for an X-fighter in the next patch and the "X-fighter is uber" thread the next day. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

Fritz Franzen

LeadSpitter_
05-25-2004, 09:02 PM
Im happy with all planes we get, I rather see aircraft with documented kills or that been shot down in service.

http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif