Tater-SW-
08-30-2004, 02:36 PM
The default skins for player, AI, and static planes in Il-2/FB/AEP are clearly linked to the maps at some level since there are different winter and summer skins for many plane types, and they appear automatically based upon the map being summer or winter.
Since this technology is already built into even the first Il-2, would it be possible to have map-based default skins for (and unique to) PF?
Ie: the Pearl Harbor map would select the early war skins as default (as a summer map would select summer skins), while the Saipan map would select Saipan specific skins (Late war skins---as a winter map would pick the winter default).
I'd be inclined to standardize on the Summer of 1942 as "early war" skins for planes that flew in that time period(after the candy-canes were removed in May). Later planes would have an early default based upon typical (not unit specific!) paint schemes used at the time they flew in combat. Late war skins for early planes might be the same as early, or could be erzatz camo for Zeros, etc (for example: default early A6M2 is Naval paint and clean (as it is now), late war A6M2 would be field applied splotchy camo). Some "late" paint late war types would have "defense of Japan" markings, or even "special attack" (the early versions of late war planes might then have non-homeland paint schemes).
The bottom line is that Il-2 already allows for 2 deafult skins per plane type (winter/summer). Please use this EXISTING feature in PF! I'm sure the skinning community would be happy to oblige you if you asked for a generic early/late scheme for each plane.
In addition, I certainly hope the default B-17, P-51D, and P-47 skins switch to a more generic color scheme (minus the D-day stripes and 8th AF markings that make them utterly inappropriate for the PTO). B-17s should be Olive Drab, ans olive or metal for P-47, and probably just metal for the P-51s. The P-40 could lose the CBI skin it has now (the skulls) and go to a generic OD skin. The US planes seem to suffer most from default skins that are specific to a certain unit, instead of an overall "typical" paint scheme.
tater
[This message was edited by Tater-SW- on Mon August 30 2004 at 01:45 PM.]
Since this technology is already built into even the first Il-2, would it be possible to have map-based default skins for (and unique to) PF?
Ie: the Pearl Harbor map would select the early war skins as default (as a summer map would select summer skins), while the Saipan map would select Saipan specific skins (Late war skins---as a winter map would pick the winter default).
I'd be inclined to standardize on the Summer of 1942 as "early war" skins for planes that flew in that time period(after the candy-canes were removed in May). Later planes would have an early default based upon typical (not unit specific!) paint schemes used at the time they flew in combat. Late war skins for early planes might be the same as early, or could be erzatz camo for Zeros, etc (for example: default early A6M2 is Naval paint and clean (as it is now), late war A6M2 would be field applied splotchy camo). Some "late" paint late war types would have "defense of Japan" markings, or even "special attack" (the early versions of late war planes might then have non-homeland paint schemes).
The bottom line is that Il-2 already allows for 2 deafult skins per plane type (winter/summer). Please use this EXISTING feature in PF! I'm sure the skinning community would be happy to oblige you if you asked for a generic early/late scheme for each plane.
In addition, I certainly hope the default B-17, P-51D, and P-47 skins switch to a more generic color scheme (minus the D-day stripes and 8th AF markings that make them utterly inappropriate for the PTO). B-17s should be Olive Drab, ans olive or metal for P-47, and probably just metal for the P-51s. The P-40 could lose the CBI skin it has now (the skulls) and go to a generic OD skin. The US planes seem to suffer most from default skins that are specific to a certain unit, instead of an overall "typical" paint scheme.
tater
[This message was edited by Tater-SW- on Mon August 30 2004 at 01:45 PM.]